And with this quote I must begin my inaugural blog (a word, a notion, I detest).
The Oscars (TM) are a week away. And each morning that I wake here, in the City of Angels - awash in useless celebrity and ridiculous excuses for fame - I'm not really affected by that world. I work on the outskirts of Independent Film (note the capital letters, such deference - right?), a collar I hold snuggly around my shoulders like a moth eaten fur from a relative... But I've worked many hours, many lifetimes, in service to the Great Industry, the Studio System (as it may still slightly exist) that keeps the town afloat, or viable - if not relevant. I've done studio time, I've done keeping-a-celebrity-at-bay-on-a-private-jet time... I've had the horrible job of telling truly gifted screenwriters (please forgive me, Scott Frank) that this-and-such needed work. So be it, I'm ashamed.
So here, in the black-hole of the blogosphere, I put myself out there. Say what you will, argue (oh please argue!) but I'm making an effort at starting a dialogue. One that can exist from being, perhaps, slightly overly academic but equally interested in being asked to see a different light, listening and working and creating here in Hollywoodland.
So, the Oscar noms...
First and, most profoundly, foremost, I must react as I'm sure you did, with WHERE THE FUCK IS RYAN GOSLING'S nomination. The morning of the nominations, when I came upon this with quite serious thoughts that my server was profoundly out of date, I was sincerely without words. I mean, Michelle Williams most certainly deserves her nomination, but did R. Gosling choke an Academy member's daughter to death (he is quite comely, and known for his craftiness with the ladies)? While Michelle was absolutely wonderful, Ryan was transcendental. And I mean that with a capital T.
As a filmgoer, and avid proponent of truth in performance and non-manipulation in editing, I've been a fan of that ersatz Mickey-house celebu-crack baby since The Believer, (where in that film, RG's kinetic performance was so impressive that the wonderfully talented Ben Foster felt he needed to rip it off in Alpha Dog - why, Foster, why? You are so gifted). None the less, so on and so forth. And, please don't disregard The Notebook, while Ryan was wondrous and Rachel McAdams was delightful - the film is not what we "aficionados" thirst for. But the Notebook is the flip side of the male/female coin to Shawshank Redemption... By that, I mean no man, boy or male-ish child should ever feel ashamed for being rendered deeply emotional over watching Shawshank. Just as the same should be said for the females and The Notebook. It's in our bones.
This is, as most of you know by now, a film about the wondrous, lustful, irrepressible joys of falling in love. And the pain, rigor and heartlessness of being shaken out of that comfort on to the hard concrete. And not since some of my favorite films of the early '70's has such truth been honored on screen. Think of Scarecrow. Think of moments of Cuckoo's Nest. And the sweet honesty of when Warren Beatty's George Roundy says to Goldie Hawn in Shampoo, "Oh... I fucked 'em all". Because aren't we all just looking for honesty?
So let's move on to the Best Picture Oscar noms...
I love me some D. Aronofsky... But that should be for a post all it's own. In the case of this film, I'm utterly offended. This is the story of a heterosexual male's misogynistic fantasy about a young woman who will do anything (DIE!!!) to please her teacher/father/lover. The ultimate desire of a narcissistic director/choreographer to see his progeny suffer for his cause. And, ooh, (lest the young ballet-inspired be disinterested) HORROR! Isn't a real life klepto/psycho Winona enough to induce horror?
This is a giddy film, not surprisingly from the dude who brought us Spanking the Monkey and Flirting with Disaster...even Three Kings. While David O. Russell, has proved himself an ebullient filmmaker, fuck - I love I Heart Huckabees. This is quite a departure, and you can feel the struggle between he and the producers over the level of reverence vs. humor that should be deployed. But D. O'R wins, as he should in this case. I've read the stories of the making of this movie.... blah blah blah. The bottom line is that there are few better foils for each other than Christian Bale's grandstanding, delightful, grave, effusive characterization and Marky Mark's subdued and honored reverence to all that his character owes. Ultimately, this is a phenomenal film, with flaws. But that better than most. And a lovely, soft and curvy and snake-biting Amy Adams, to boot.
Shear lunacy on the most intelligent scale. Christopher Nolan has never proven himself better than The Dark Knight, how could one (I dare you to look WAY beyond it as a comic book movie). But Inception is as fantastic as it is incomprehensible. As all viable directors must face, he will not be given his deserved accolades by the Academy until he does something more sophomoric. But, I beg of you C Nolan.... Don't cave.
By all my personal inclinations, this IS the best picture of the year. Lisa Cholodenko has proven, 3 times now, that she can tell a complex story about complex lives (albeit, coastal and lovingly Liberal) with conviction, originality and humor. This film just happens to hit a LOT of political buttons, and Mark Ruffalo is at his most wonderful as the straight father/lover. Regardless, this is a movie about a serious subject, but is most certainly not dressed up in serious clothes. It's delightful, and yet deeply affecting. For those of you not in the Tea Party.
What can be said, other than (as my close friend, Elliott, coined this yearly Academy fixture) it's "the cute foreign film of the year"... Stuffed with reputable actors, writers and a solid director. About a subject, we erudite Americans all love - The Monarchy!!! Especially a tarnished one. I, no doubt, expect it to win every award in the book. The cloying little bastard of a movie.... But I must ask, when oh when will there be a Wallis Simpson bio-pic?
As far as the sheer art of filmmaking... Thereby turning something static into something liquid, vivacious and utterly transfixing, this Danny Boyle film is phenomenal. I challenge any filmmaker to make a movie about a dude who gets stuck between a rock and harder place to make a more vital and vibrant film. Seriously, I'm a producer... come at me.
"The Social Network"
I'm a Fincher fan, I've been fascinated by his desire to wrestle with the art of storytelling and the arts & crafts of filmmaking since I first heard him give what-for to an aimless ad exec who did not know her boundaries. And The Social Network is the closest he's come, so far, to riding his personal philosophical line and that of the Industry. He's a far more gifted storyteller than I think he's even willing to account for, preferring to bury himself in the tech. But Angus, Cean, etc are there to guide him so I'm not sending my sirens out to worry over his cause.
All that really needs to be said about this movie is watch the first scene. Rarely has a single scene been so insightful and prurient about the coming two hours. And rarely has that time been spent in such dialogical and filmic delight. Bless Fincher for delivering on the promise he has always shown. And that is by no means to diminish the effect he has had on advertising, uber- advertising, film etc... But for allowing what seems like a true, personal editorial to come forth through the often disingenuous river of film.
What can I say, you laugh, you cry (in my case like a goddamn baby).
This is a Coen Brothers movie for the masses. Not to discredit it, under any circumstances, but so much of what makes a Coen Bros. movie a Coen Bros. movie is its laissez-faire attitude about what Hollywood wants, or needs. Hailee Steinfeld has a lot more to say with her lovely face and obstinate braids than anything she could utter with her weird accent and inability to hit the right word. Nonetheless, this is an exquisite movie. Owing as much to "Roderick James" as it does (perhaps more) to the ever impenetrable Roger Deakins.
This is the unlikely candidate filled usually only by the "cute foreign film of the year". But this is a far better piece of filmmaking than The King's Speech. This movie is raw and alive and full of contextual duplicity. While struggling at the edge if what New Filmmaking refers to as Regional Filmmaking, this little, almost precious film moves well beyond the constructs of the need to survive in the world of rural Appalachia, a world of abuse, meth and the negligence of hope, to show not just a will to survive but a preternatural need to survive, without the desire to rise above "a station". A simple hope to do better for the younger then we might have done for ourselves. And what it more basic and natural than that?
So, bring forth the commentary. I look forward to it all... And let's just see what happens on Oscar night. But, please forego any fashion commentary - unless something falls off and reveals a breast. Cause that would be delightful.